Omo, dis Supreme Court matter don turn something else for Colorado state. Dem just collect another big loss for court, na di third time for recent years wey dem dey correct Colorado for culture war cases. Dis one na about conversion therapy ban wey dem sign into law for 2019.
Di court say 8-1 wey Justice Neil Gorsuch write di main opinion, say Colorado law dey violate First Amendment because e dey restrict talk therapy only when di therapy wan prevent minors from embracing being transgender or gay. Gorsuch yarn say such laws wey dey suppress speech based on viewpoint na “egregious assault” on di Constitution.
Di case center on Kaley Chiles, licensed faith-based counselor for Colorado Springs, wey argue say she dey help youths reach their own stated goals. Colorado argue say dem fit regulate Chiles therapy because e dey amount to professional conduct and dem wan protect minors from harmful counseling.
But dis one no be di first time Colorado dey collect dis kin correction. Remember 2023 case, 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, wey Supreme Court find 6-3 say First Amendment bar Colorado from using state Anti-Discrimination Act to force website designer to create wedding websites for same-sex couples. Dat time, court say state no fit force person to create content wey carry message wey dem no agree with.
Even before dat one, for 2018, na Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Justices side with baker Jack Phillips, find say Colorado Civil Rights Commission show unconstitutional hostility toward his religious beliefs wey dem no show to other bakers.
Carrie Severino, president of legal watchdog JCN, tell Fox News Digital say “Colorado seems hell-bent on enforcing its own new orthodoxy of thought, and di Supreme Court don come back time and time again to correct dem and remind dem say First Amendment protect freedom of speech, freedom of religion, even when state no agree with person opinions.”
Jim Campbell, Alliance Defending Freedom attorney wey represent Chiles before Supreme Court during oral arguments, add say Colorado “has proven itself to be no respecter of di First Amendment. Di State of Colorado don show utter disregard for di First Amendment rights of people like Kaley Chiles.”
Terry Schilling, president of conservative American Principles, observe di trend for Colorado, say Democrats there “go stomp on di rights of anyone wey stand for di way of di well-heeled gay and transgender lobby whether na bakers, doctors, or desperate families.”
Outside First Amendment cases, Colorado don still be testing ground for other polarizing legal fights wey reach Supreme Court. Just for Trump v. Anderson, justices unanimously reverse Colorado Supreme Court decision to remove President Donald Trump from 2024 presidential primary ballot over allegations say he incite insurrection, find say state lack authority to remove am.
All dis dey happen as Supreme Court wey President Donald Trump three appointees remake don become di first since at least 1950s to reject civil rights claims for majority of cases involving women and minorities, according to detailed analysis conduct for The Washington Post.
For Nebraska matter, different Supreme Court wahala dey play. Committee of lawyers recommend say Omaha attorney Greg Lake wey dem accuse of using AI to write state Supreme Court brief for divorce case go get temporary suspension from practicing law. Nebraska Council for Discipline recommend temporary suspension of Lake law license after case he argue before Nebraska Supreme Court for February.
Justice ask Lake: “Di elephant for room be whether or not you use artificial intelligence. Did you?” Lake reply: “No, I did not.” Lake repeatedly deny to Nebraska Supreme Court justices say he use AI. Justices dismiss di divorce appeal last month, say his “assertion say he simply file di wrong draft” no dey credible.
Lake client for di divorce case na Jason Regan. Regan say he just receive bill from opposing counsel for $17,000, due by Friday, and owe another $35,000 for his ex legal fees. He say he dey exhausted and frustrated with legal system as he fight to remain for his daughter life and no sure if he get stomach or finances to hire malpractice attorney for another legal fight.
Di pattern dey clear. Supreme Court dey consistently push back against state actions wey dem see as violating constitutional protections. Colorado don become regular customer for dis kin correction. Legal experts dey watch closely as dis trends continue to shape di boundaries between state regulation and individual rights.
Do you have a news tip for NNN? Please email us at editor @ nnn.ng
