Connect with us


EFCC, ICPC to Respond in Lawsuit Against Atiku by Keyamo



EFCC Indicates Intention to Respond

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), on Thursday, indicated its intention to respond in a suit filed by Festus Keyamo against Atiku Abubakar, presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 25 February poll.

ICPC Plans to File Its Response

This was also as Oluwakemi Odogun, lawyer to the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC), told Justice James Omotosho of a Federal High Court, Abuja of the commission’s plan to file its response in the case.

Mr Keyamo’s Suit Against Mr Abubakar

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Mr Keyamo, a spokesperson of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential Campaign Council (PCC), had instituted the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/84/2023 against Mr Abubakar over allegations bordering on money laundering.

The Joining Defendants

Also joined as defendants in the suit are the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), ICPC and the EFCC as 2nd to 4th defendants respectively.

Request for Arrest

Mr Keyamo had earlier asked law enforcement agencies to arrest Atiku based on an audio recording released by Michael Achimugu, his former aide.

Threatened to Strike Out Suit

NAN reports that Justice Omotosho had, on 7 March, threatened to strike out the suit over Mr Keyamo’s inability to diligently prosecute the case.

Requested for Adjournment

Upon resumed hearing, Mr Keyamo’s counsel, Okechukwu Uju-azorji, informed that the matter was slated for hearing.
Mr Uju-azorji said that the former vice president, the 1st defendant, served on him a preliminary objection and that they had responded.
The lawyer said Atiku, however, was not represented in court today to take his application.
He asked the court for an adjournment to enable the 1st defendant to take his objection.

EFCC Asks for Time to File

The counsel to the EFCC, Senami Adeosun, who also asked the court for a short time to enable them to file their process in the suit, said they were still within time to respond.

ICPC Seeks Adjournment

Mr Odogun, who represented ICPC, spoke in the same vein.
“We were served on March 15 with the originating processes. We sought an adjournment since we are within time to file,” she said.

Next Hearing Date

The judge adjourned the matter until 18 April for a hearing of the pending preliminary objection.
Mr Omotosho, who ordered that hearing notices be issued to Atiku and CCB, who were not represented in court, directed that parties interested in filing any application should do so before the next adjourned date.

Preliminary Objection Filed by Atiku’s Lawyer

NAN reports that in a preliminary objection filed by Atiku’s lawyer, Mike Ozekhome, the ex-vice president sought an order striking out or dismissing the suit for being incompetent and want of “locus standi.”
The lawyer, who argued that the suit be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, said the case failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action against his client.

Keyamo’s Counter Affidavit

But Mr Keyamo, in a counter affidavit deposed to by Henry Offiah, a litigation clerk in his chamber, averred that the CCB, ICPC and EFCC failed to respond to the allegations he raised against Atiku and indeed failed to take any steps to invite or arrest him for the purpose of investigating the allegations against him.
He said on 16 January, he wrote a petition to the three agencies requesting them to invite the former vice president for the purpose of conducting investigations into the said allegations.
He said that they refused to commence any form of investigation with respect to the allegations. Mr Keyamo said he was aggrieved and instituted the present action on 20 January.

Allegations Against Atiku

“The allegations made against the 1st defendant (Abubakar) are the subject matter of the investigation sought by the plaintiff and the plaintiff seeks reliefs against the 1st defendant,” the document read.




analytics analytics