China lawmakers urge freeing up family planning as birth rates plunge
Guangdong Province Delegate, Li Bingji, said in a proposal that population was China’s number-one priority for the next four decades.
With its population ageing as a result of longer lifespans and a dwindling number of children, the world’s most populous nation decided in 2016 to allow all couples to have a second child.
This had relaxed a tough one-child policy in place since 1978.
But birth rates plummeted for the second consecutive year in 2018.
Policymakers now fret about the impact a long-term decline in births will have on the economy and its strained health and social services.
In proposals submitted at the National People’s Congress, delegates from across the country urged leaders to improve healthcare and maternity benefits, offer tax breaks and provide more free public education.
Some went further, saying China should forget about trying to control births and even remove all references to family planning from the constitution.
“Continued control over fertility will inevitably defeat the purpose and make it even harder to resolve ingrained population problems,” Bingji said.
The number of live births per 1,000 people fell to 10.94 in 2018, official data showed, less than a third of the 1949 level.
Liaoning in the northeast, which has seen its population decline in recent years, has a birth rate of 6.49 per thousand.
The estimated number of children each Chinese mother will have in their lifetime is 1.6, down from 5.18 in 1970. The global average is 2.45.
Think tanks expect China’s population to peak at 1.4 billion in 2029 and then begin an “unstoppable’’ decline that could reduce the workforce by as much as 200 million by 2050.
They also forecast that over-60s will account for 25 per cent of the population by 2035, up from 17.3 per cent in 2017.
More than a third of China’s population could be over 60 by the middle of the century.
According to Steven Mosher, President of the U.S.-based Population Research Institute which opposes government attempts to control population; China is entering a “low-birthrate recession’’.
“China has set up a deadly demographic trap for itself, condemning itself to low or no growth for years to come, regardless of how many babies they can, using persuasion or compulsion, get young women to bear,” he said.
Though proposals submitted by ordinary delegates have no legal status, they have symbolic significance and allow the discussion of matters not ordinarily aired in public.
In theory, they will also be considered by policy-making committees.
Some delegates, including Xiong Sidong of Jiangsu province, even urged the state to remove “family planning” from the constitution.
“To drop the requirement that all couples plan their births from the constitution would be a major shift in thinking,’’ Susan Greenhalgh, research professor at Harvard University said.
“The planning of human production nationwide has since the mid-1970s, been deem as vital to China’s modernisation as the planning of material production,” Greenhalgh said, who studied the one-child policy.
The original restrictions were aimed at curbing runaway population growth, and required the establishment of family planning offices in every village across the country.
Critics alleged that the policy was enforced through compulsory abortions and violated human rights.
It also created gender imbalances as poor rural families chose to abort or abandon baby girls.
The government has defended the programme, saying it allowed the country to limit population growth by around 400 million and thereby tackle entrenched poverty.
Researchers warn of a demographic time-bomb, with a dwindling workforce unable to pay the health care bills of the elderly, but after four decades, the policy adjustments could prove too little too late.
“Virtually no country in the world has been able to coax birth rates up for a significant period of time after childbearing rates have dropped with modernisation,” said Greenhalgh.