Wetin dey happen for social media world don carry Meta go court for New Mexico, and jury don decide say the company don harm pikin dem mental health. The case wey last for almost seven weeks don end with jury wey agree say Meta, wey get Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp, don violate state consumer protection laws. The penalty wey dem give Meta reach $375 million for all the violations wey dem see.
New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez wey file the case for 2023 say Meta no dey tell people the true about how social media fit cause addiction for pikin dem. The state use undercover investigation where agents create social media accounts wey dem pose as children to show how sexual predators dey target pikin for the platform. The jury agree say Meta dey make false statements and engage for “unconscionable” trade practices wey dey take advantage of children wey no get experience.
For the trial, dem mention big names like Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Instagram head Adam Mosseri and Meta global head of safety Antigone Davis. The jury consider whether social media users don dey misled by statements wey these people make about platform safety. Meta attorney Kevin Huff talk for court say the company dey invest for safety because e good for business and because e be the right thing to do. But prosecution attorney Linda Singer argue say Meta algorithms dey push content wey fit harm children.
This New Mexico case be among the first wey reach trial for plenty lawsuits wey dey against social media companies about how dem affect children. For California federal court, another jury dey deliberate whether Meta and YouTube go liable for harms wey dem cause children for their platforms. More than 40 state attorneys general don file lawsuits against Meta, claim say the company dey contribute to mental health crisis among young people by designing Instagram and Facebook features wey dey addictive.
Meta no dey agree say social media addiction exist, but executives for trial acknowledge “problematic use” and say dem want people to feel good about the time wey dem spend for Meta platforms. The company talk say dem dey disclose risks and dey try to remove harmful content, but dem admit say some bad material still dey pass through their safety net.
What go happen next na second phase of the trial wey go hold for May before judge without jury. This phase go determine whether Meta create public nuisance and whether dem go order the company to change their ways and pay for remedies. The case fit shape how future lawsuits and regulation of social media platforms go be for America.
Social media companies don dey protected by Section 230 of the U.S. Communications Decency Act wey dey protect dem from liability for material wey people post for their platforms. But New Mexico prosecutors argue say Meta still suppose responsible for how dem dey push content through complex algorithms wey dey spread material wey fit harm children.
The trial come as school districts and legislators dey want more restrictions on how pikin dem dey use smartphones for classrooms. Meta don announce earlier this week say dem go introduce “Instagram Teen Accounts” wey go be new experience for teens wey parents go guide. The company talk say dem want make young people safe for their platforms.
This landmark decision for New Mexico show say government dey look social media companies with strong eye. As technology dey change, the law dey try to catch up with how these platforms dey affect society, especially young people. The $375 million penalty na big signal say states no dey fear to hold tech giants accountable for their actions.
For the meantime, parents and guardians suppose dey monitor how their children dey use social media. Experts dey advise say dem limit screen time and talk with pikin dem about online safety. As the legal battles dey continue, e important for everyone to understand the risks wey come with social media use, especially for young minds wey still dey develop.
Do you have a news tip for NNN? Please email us at editor @ nnn.ng
